Sánchez Manzano "the killer" of the evidence of 11-M
Gallardón said by active and passive we already knew everything there was to know about the attacks March 11 2004.Tanto so that the mayor of Madrid, with the connivance of the higher powers of the state, got to sit on a stool and ordered in the first instance to the broadcaster EsRadio philologist and Federico Jimenez Losantos. And it's not forget that one of the reasons that led to the beheading of Teruel was his fervent defense of the bombings in Madrid are anything but what they told us Bermúdez and company.
These days we know how judges Sanchez Manzano archived complaints against anyone who had dared to sully his dubious honor. Moreover, we know these days that the sausage was devoted Manzano (and God knows how many others with him) to destroy evidence of the bombings in Madrid.
not forget, the Madrid bombings were a few very rare. Some attacks where no one knows that exploded in the trains (which were quickly destroyed by the way), where there is not one Atocha camera to record the alleged Islamists who allegedly carried out the attacks and where today do not know who was the mind behind them, and worse, who was the financial support of them.
In summary I would like to reproduce this press Civic Platform Black Pawns I think may be of great interest.
black laborers like to express his surprise at the statement de Sánchez Manzano as alleged by the complaint filed by the default AAVV11M the duty to prosecute crimes, concealment concealment of evidence and false testimonio.En his appearance before the judge admits that he ordered destroyed nearly all traces collected explosive outbreaks of the attacks on 11 March. The reason adduced is that they were classified as mere "objects" rather than evidence or samples for determining the explosive utilizado.Sin but the Criminal Procedure Act makes no distinction between "objects" and "samples" and establishes the duty of care of any evidence from the scene of a crime under the supervision of the investigator, that is one who can decide which expert evidence has value and what not. But in the summary of March 11 has not any document that Judge Del Olmo, in the case, authorizes such destruction remains the most serious outbreaks of explosión.Todavía Manzano is that Sanchez could not give a satisfactory explanation to the fact that fail to reach the expert's opinion remains selected and reviewed by the expert chemist of EOD proceeding. also charged in this because it opened at the Court of Instruction No. 43 have declared a six EOD witnesses who participated in collecting the remains March 11 and subsequent days, which have shown that no evidence ever are removed and not aware of that have never been destroyed evidence without a warrant. According to his statement only in the Atocha station were collected 80 bags of debris, while the expert of the trial came only 23 samples in total of the four bombed trains.
have also stated that Sanchez Manzano took over operational control which corresponded, according to the protocol of action, the Provincial Brigade citizen Madrid.Desde this platform are confident that the case against Sanchez Manzano allow solving the disappearance of the samples collected March 11 onwards, which has prevented the determination of the explosive used in the attacks. We hope that in turn the Ministry of Interior opened an internal investigation to determine over the responsibilities arising from these hechos.Por Finally we express our solidarity with the journalist for El Mundo Antonio Rubio, which the prosecution asks for three years in prison for a alleged crime of divulging secrets, revealing that the magnet 'Cartagena' was an informer infiltrated into plots of 11-M.
fabric has the matter, including the Antonio Rubio. Has provided material that the culprit is a journalist, regardless of wrongdoing in office. I still remember the journalists of the world who were fined by the world famous photo of Gonzales wandering the halls court after securing to a dozen judges who were not aware of the GAL. GAL and 11-M, two chapters of our history modrna of which at least one, yet we know nothing.
Gallardón said by active and passive we already knew everything there was to know about the attacks March 11 2004.Tanto so that the mayor of Madrid, with the connivance of the higher powers of the state, got to sit on a stool and ordered in the first instance to the broadcaster EsRadio philologist and Federico Jimenez Losantos. And it's not forget that one of the reasons that led to the beheading of Teruel was his fervent defense of the bombings in Madrid are anything but what they told us Bermúdez and company.
These days we know how judges Sanchez Manzano archived complaints against anyone who had dared to sully his dubious honor. Moreover, we know these days that the sausage was devoted Manzano (and God knows how many others with him) to destroy evidence of the bombings in Madrid.
not forget, the Madrid bombings were a few very rare. Some attacks where no one knows that exploded in the trains (which were quickly destroyed by the way), where there is not one Atocha camera to record the alleged Islamists who allegedly carried out the attacks and where today do not know who was the mind behind them, and worse, who was the financial support of them.
In summary I would like to reproduce this press Civic Platform Black Pawns I think may be of great interest.
black laborers like to express his surprise at the statement de Sánchez Manzano as alleged by the complaint filed by the default AAVV11M the duty to prosecute crimes, concealment concealment of evidence and false testimonio.En his appearance before the judge admits that he ordered destroyed nearly all traces collected explosive outbreaks of the attacks on 11 March. The reason adduced is that they were classified as mere "objects" rather than evidence or samples for determining the explosive utilizado.Sin but the Criminal Procedure Act makes no distinction between "objects" and "samples" and establishes the duty of care of any evidence from the scene of a crime under the supervision of the investigator, that is one who can decide which expert evidence has value and what not. But in the summary of March 11 has not any document that Judge Del Olmo, in the case, authorizes such destruction remains the most serious outbreaks of explosión.Todavía Manzano is that Sanchez could not give a satisfactory explanation to the fact that fail to reach the expert's opinion remains selected and reviewed by the expert chemist of EOD proceeding. also charged in this because it opened at the Court of Instruction No. 43 have declared a six EOD witnesses who participated in collecting the remains March 11 and subsequent days, which have shown that no evidence ever are removed and not aware of that have never been destroyed evidence without a warrant. According to his statement only in the Atocha station were collected 80 bags of debris, while the expert of the trial came only 23 samples in total of the four bombed trains.
have also stated that Sanchez Manzano took over operational control which corresponded, according to the protocol of action, the Provincial Brigade citizen Madrid.Desde this platform are confident that the case against Sanchez Manzano allow solving the disappearance of the samples collected March 11 onwards, which has prevented the determination of the explosive used in the attacks. We hope that in turn the Ministry of Interior opened an internal investigation to determine over the responsibilities arising from these hechos.Por Finally we express our solidarity with the journalist for El Mundo Antonio Rubio, which the prosecution asks for three years in prison for a alleged crime of divulging secrets, revealing that the magnet 'Cartagena' was an informer infiltrated into plots of 11-M.
fabric has the matter, including the Antonio Rubio. Has provided material that the culprit is a journalist, regardless of wrongdoing in office. I still remember the journalists of the world who were fined by the world famous photo of Gonzales wandering the halls court after securing to a dozen judges who were not aware of the GAL. GAL and 11-M, two chapters of our history modrna of which at least one, yet we know nothing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment